TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The following application has been submitted for a Department of the Army Permit (DA) under the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This notice serves as the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) request to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) to act on the Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the following application.
APPLICANT: Mr. Randall Monteith
City of Green
1755 Town Park Boulevard
P.O. Box 278
Green, Ohio 44232
LOCATION: As depicted on the November 7, 2014 “Site Location Map,” (Sheet 1 of 5), the proposed project would be located in an unnamed tributary to Nimisila Reservoir and abutting wetland located approximately 0.02 mile northeast of the intersection of Shriver Road and Steese Road in the City of Green, Summit County, Ohio (latitude 40.94927, longitude -81.47017). Waters on-site drain into the Nimisila Reservoir, a component of the Portage Lakes system, a traditional navigable water of the United States.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK: The applicant has requested a DA permit authorization to discharge dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States, as depicted on the November 14, 2014 “Preferred Alternative Site Plan with Wetland Impacts,” map (Sheet 2 of 5), December 8, 2014 “Wetland Area – Typical Section,” drawing (Sheet 3 of 5), and December 8, 2014 “Stream Area – Typical Section,” drawing (Sheet 4 of 5) in conjunction with the construction of a recreational facility referred to as Central Park. Approximately 1.82 acres of Wetland A would be affected as a result of the discharge of dredged and/or fill material for the construction of a playground and amphitheater, and approximately 350 linear feet of Stream 1 would be affected as a result of of the discharge of fill material for the excavation and installation of a stormwater basin. The plans (Sheets 1-5) for the proposed project are attached to this Public Notice.
ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS: The applicant’s basic project purpose is to construct a recreational facility. A total of 1.82 acres of wetland and 350 linear feet of stream channel would be affected as a result of the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States as a result of the proposal. The project does not require access or proximity to or siting within the wetlands to fulfill its basic purpose and is considered a non-water dependent activity. The Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines state that for non-water dependent activities in special aquatic sites, practicable alternatives that do not involve wetlands are presumed to be available, unless clearly demonstrated otherwise. The applicant is required to provide an alternative analysis that must overcome that presumption prior to receiving authorization for the discharge of fill material into the wetlands. The applicant has submitted the required alternatives analysis, and it is currently under review. A complete copy of the alternatives analysis can be reviewed by appointment at the above address. No permit will be issued until our review of the alternatives analysis clearly shows that upland alternatives are not available to achieve the project purpose.
AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION: In evaluating a project area containing waters of the United States, consideration must be given to avoiding impacts on this site. If waters of the United States cannot be avoided, then impacts must be minimized. A total of 781 linear feet of one (1) perennial flowing stream channel (Stream 1), one palustrine emergent/scrub-shrub wetland (Wetland A) totaling 2.47 acres, and two open water features (Pond 1 and Pond 2) totaling 1.13 acres, subject to Section 404 Clean Water Act regulation, exist on the project site documented in the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) completed by this office on August 14, 2013 under DA file number LRH-2013-634-TUS – UT to Nimisila Reservoir. The July 16, 2013 “Figure B3 – Aquatic Resources Map,” (Sheet 5 of 5) depicts the delineated aquatic resources covered under the aforementioned PJD.
According to the applicant, alternative plans were considered. Avoidance and minimization efforts were incorporated into the proposal to reduce the footprint of the proposed project. The applicant’s proposed project would avoid 431 linear feet (55%) of the on-site perennial stream channel, 0.65 acre (26%) of the on-site palustrine emergent/scrub-shrub wetland, and 1.13 acres (100%) of the on-site open water features. Stormwater management planning would incorporate best management practices and water pollution controls necessary to maintain compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and Ohio Water Pollution Control Act. Construction activities would be performed during low flow stream conditions. All disturbed areas would be seeded and/or revegetated with native plant species and native seed mixes after completion of construction activities.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN: The applicant proposes to compensate for the loss of aquatic resource functions as a result of the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into approximately 1.82 acres of jurisdictional wetland by purchasing 3.7 credits through the United States Army Corps of Engineers Huntington District In-Lieu Fee Program administered by the Ohio Wetlands Foundation. The applicant proposes to compensate for the loss of aquatic resource functions as a result of the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into approximately 350 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel by enhancing approximately 350 linear feet of stream channel on-site. The stream channel enhancement would include a 30 to 60 foot riparian buffer, and the enhanced stream channel and riparian buffer would be preserved in perpetuity.
WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION: A Section 401 Water Quality Certification is required for this project. It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain certification from the OEPA.
HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES: The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) has been consulted and it has been determined there are no properties currently listed on
the NRHP which would be indirectly or directly affected by the proposed work. The applicant has provided a copy of an Ohio Historic Preservation Database map dated October 1, 2014. We have determined the proposed project would have no effect on historic properties. A copy of this Public Notice will be furnished to the Ohio Historic Preservation Office for their review. Comments concerning archaeological sensitivity of the project area should be based on collected data.
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES: The proposed project is located within the known or historic range of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), the proposed endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), and the threatened northern monkshood (Aconitum noveboracense). The applicant has indicated no suitable habitat for the Indiana bat, the northern long-eared bat or the northern monkshood is present within the proposed project boundary. The Corps has consulted the most recently available information, and has determined the proposed project would result in no effect to northern monkshood and may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect either the Indiana bat or the northern long-eared bat. Based on this information, the proposed project is not likely to adversely affect the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species, or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat of such species which has been determined to be critical. This Public Notice serves as a request for concurrence from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service with the aforementioned effect determinations and for any additional information they may have on whether any listed or proposed to be listed endangered or threatened species may be present in the area which would be affected by the activity, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1972 (as amended).
PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS: This application will be reviewed in accordance with 33 CFR 320‑332, the Regulatory Program of the Corps, and other pertinent laws, regulations, and executive orders. Our evaluation will also follow the guidelines published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 404(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act (40 CFR part 230). The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors
that may be relevant to the proposal will be considered, including the cumulative effects thereof; among those factors are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.
SOLICITATION OF COMMENTS: The Corps is soliciting comments from the public, Federal, state and local agencies and officials, Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. For accuracy and completeness of the administrative record, all data in support of or in opposition to the proposed work should be submitted in writing setting forth sufficient detail to furnish a clear understanding of the reasons for support or opposition. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period
specified in the notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. Written statements received in this office on or before the expiration date of this Public Notice will become a part of the record and will be considered in the final determination. A permit will be granted unless its issuance is found to be contrary to the public interest.
CLOSE OF COMMENT PERIOD: All comments pertaining to this Public Notice must reach this office on or before the close of the comment period listed on page one of this Public Notice.
If no comments are received by that date, it will be considered that there are no objections. Comments and requests for additional information should be submitted to:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Public Notice No. LRH-2014-1038-TUS – UT to Nimisila Reservoir
502 Eighth Street
Huntington, West Virginia 25701-2070.
Please note names and addresses of those who submit comments in response to this Public Notice become part of our administrative record and, as such, are available to the public under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Thank you for your interest in our nation’s water resources. If you have any questions concerning this Public Notice, please contact Mr. Cory L. Wilson of the North Branch at 330-364-6177.